Smart Eq Fortwo Premium MOT Check
MOT pass rates, common failures, and reliability data for the Smart Eq Fortwo Premium. Check any Eq Fortwo Premium by registration number below.
Free, instant, no sign-up required.
78.3%
Avg Pass Rate
+2.1%
vs Smart Avg
81
Year Ranges
Good
Reliability
Smart Eq Fortwo Premium — MOT Reliability Overview
The Smart Eq Fortwo Premium has an average MOT pass rate of 78.3%, which is 2.1 percentage points above the Smart brand average of 76.2%. This is a reasonable result that reflects typical UK reliability standards. Regular servicing and addressing advisories promptly will help keep your Eq Fortwo Premium on the road.
The most common reasons a Smart Eq Fortwo Premium fails its MOT are a tyre seriously damaged, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened. If you are preparing your Eq Fortwo Premium for its MOT, checking these areas first could save you a retest fee. Our detailed fault analysis includes estimated repair costs for each failure type.
Before buying a used Smart Eq Fortwo Premium, we recommend checking the full MOT history, write-off status, outstanding finance, and stolen vehicle status. These checks can be done for free using the registration number.
MOT Pass Rate by Year
How the Smart Eq Fortwo Premium performs at MOT across different model years.
2021
Based on 256 vehicles
1.6%
5.9%
16k mi
2021
Based on 159 vehicles
1.3%
9.6%
18k mi
2021
Based on 34 vehicles
0.0%
12k mi
2021
Based on 78 vehicles
1.3%
6.5%
18k mi
2021
Based on 335 vehicles
0.6%
4.3%
17k mi
2021
Based on 117 vehicles
0.9%
2.6%
15k mi
2021
Based on 333 vehicles
0.3%
1.5%
18k mi
2021
Based on 34 vehicles
2.9%
2.9%
16k mi
2020
Based on 523 vehicles
2.2%
8.0%
15k mi
17k mi
2020
Based on 77 vehicles
0.0%
4.2%
18k mi
2020
Based on 656 vehicles
1.4%
9.3%
16k mi
18k mi
2020
Based on 197 vehicles
0.8%
3.1%
18k mi
2014
Based on 35 vehicles
0.0%
10.5%
2014
Based on 61 vehicles
0.0%
18.6%
62k mi
2013
Based on 33 vehicles
15.8%
54k mi
2013
Based on 31 vehicles
68k mi
2013
Based on 245 vehicles
2.8%
12.7%
72k mi
2013
Based on 2,839 vehicles
3.9%
23.4%
74k mi
2013
Based on 166 vehicles
4.5%
10.7%
74k mi
2013
Based on 399 vehicles
3.0%
18.7%
92k mi
2013
Based on 36 vehicles
0.0%
20.0%
75k mi
2013
Based on 162 vehicles
1.9%
7.6%
71k mi
2013
Based on 461 vehicles
5.7%
17.6%
62k mi
2013
Based on 114 vehicles
7.1%
11.4%
69k mi
2013
Based on 306 vehicles
2.6%
21.7%
66k mi
2013
Based on 133 vehicles
4.8%
15.5%
94k mi
2013
Based on 595 vehicles
4.7%
18.4%
84k mi
2013
Based on 658 vehicles
4.2%
23.0%
74k mi
2012
Based on 68 vehicles
10.3%
12.8%
80k mi
2012
Based on 1,081 vehicles
3.5%
23.3%
76k mi
2012
Based on 74 vehicles
4.5%
36.4%
2012
Based on 31 vehicles
36.8%
2012
Based on 79 vehicles
0.0%
10.0%
2012
Based on 185 vehicles
4.7%
26.2%
2012
Based on 145 vehicles
3.1%
8.2%
2012
Based on 267 vehicles
3.7%
19.0%
96k mi
2011
Based on 92 vehicles
3.9%
47.1%
2011
Based on 223 vehicles
4.5%
21.8%
2011
Based on 89 vehicles
1.7%
23.7%
2011
Based on 984 vehicles
5.0%
25.6%
2011
Based on 112 vehicles
8.7%
21.7%
2011
Based on 247 vehicles
4.7%
20.7%
2010
Based on 350 vehicles
3.0%
20.8%
2010
Based on 211 vehicles
5.6%
24.0%
2010
Based on 287 vehicles
5.0%
30.0%
2010
Based on 790 vehicles
4.3%
22.9%
2010
Based on 180 vehicles
5.6%
23.1%
2010
Based on 83 vehicles
0.0%
25.5%
2009
Based on 101 vehicles
2.9%
21.4%
2009
Based on 931 vehicles
4.1%
25.7%
2009
Based on 314 vehicles
3.2%
27.6%
2009
Based on 139 vehicles
2.4%
23.2%
2009
Based on 43 vehicles
7.7%
23.1%
2009
Based on 62 vehicles
5.1%
20.5%
2009
Based on 35 vehicles
5.0%
35.0%
2009
Based on 213 vehicles
4.6%
29.8%
2009
Based on 63 vehicles
3.1%
31.3%
2008
Based on 113 vehicles
2.9%
20.0%
2008
Based on 31 vehicles
15.8%
2008
Based on 828 vehicles
4.8%
25.2%
2008
Based on 314 vehicles
3.8%
26.9%
2008
Based on 114 vehicles
8.6%
24.3%
2008
Based on 148 vehicles
8.0%
39.8%
2008
Based on 64 vehicles
2.7%
24.3%
2007
Based on 105 vehicles
3.3%
45.0%
2007
Based on 43 vehicles
13.0%
21.7%
2007
Based on 46 vehicles
0.0%
17.2%
2007
Based on 305 vehicles
5.0%
33.9%
2007
Based on 35 vehicles
11.1%
2007
Based on 37 vehicles
3.6%
10.7%
2007
Based on 59 vehicles
0.0%
36.6%
2006
Based on 46 vehicles
3.6%
39.3%
2006
Based on 65 vehicles
5.6%
16.7%
2006
Based on 33 vehicles
11.1%
2006
Based on 32 vehicles
26.7%
2006
Based on 66 vehicles
2.0%
10.2%
2006
Based on 33 vehicles
4.3%
26.1%
2005
Based on 35 vehicles
4.5%
31.8%
2005
Based on 30 vehicles
21.1%
2005
Based on 50 vehicles
3.4%
17.2%
2004
Based on 43 vehicles
4.2%
45.8%
Top MOT Failures — Smart Eq Fortwo Premium
The most common reasons a Smart Eq Fortwo Premium fails its MOT, aggregated across all year ranges.
A tyre seriously damaged
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction
Where Failures Occur
The areas of the vehicle most commonly flagged during MOT inspections.
Front Offside
Front
Rear Offside
Other Smart Models
Compare MOT reliability across Smart models.
Smart Eq Fortwo Premium — Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about the Smart Eq Fortwo Premium MOT and reliability.
What is the MOT pass rate for the Smart Eq Fortwo Premium?
What are the most common MOT failures on a Smart Eq Fortwo Premium?
Is the Smart Eq Fortwo Premium reliable?
How do I check the MOT history of a Smart Eq Fortwo Premium?
What mileage should I expect on a Smart Eq Fortwo Premium?
Check Your Smart Eq Fortwo Premium's MOT History
Enter the registration number for the full MOT history — free and instant.