Skip to main content
GB
MOT
Checkup
Original analysis · 91,592,223 defect lines

Nearside or Offside? What 91.6 Million MOT Defects Show

By Bertram Sargla, Founder, MOT CheckupLast updated: 2026-08-28Data sourced from DVSA
Published 2026-08-14Last updated: August 2026Next scheduled review: February 2027Geography: United Kingdom

Key findings

  • Across the fleet the two sides are level — a nearside excess of just 0.47% (30,805,048 nearside against 30,661,257 offside), with front and rear quadrants both inside 1.5% of parity. There is no general “nearside problem”. We previously reported one and have withdrawn it.
  • Distorted road wheels are recorded on the nearside 1.97 times as often as the offside — 322,209 against 163,859, n = 486,068 sided lines. Road wheels is the most nearside-skewed section in the data at 1.743, and a buckled wheel is the defect a single hard impact causes.
  • Seat belt webbing damage runs the other way by more than the same factor — 88,618 offside against 38,006 nearside, 2.33×, n = 126,624. That is the driver’s belt, used on every journey. Two mirror-image results from two different mechanisms, in a dataset whose average is flat.
  • 66.7% of defect lines are advisories, not reasons to fail, and 3,543,478 lines (3.87%) carry DVSA’s dangerous marker. The single most-recorded item in the country is tyre tread depth: 10,702,929 lines.

How we worked this out

The source is DfT and DVSA’s Anonymised MOT tests and results dataset — the bulk open publication on data.gov.uk, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence. It carries no registration mark and no VIN. We read every defect item line recorded against a class 4 or class 7 test in 2025: 92,473,454 item rows, resolving to 91,592,223 defect lines across 25,734,021 tests on 20,555,638 vehicles.

Where the side comes from. It is not parsed out of the defect text. Each item line carries DVSA’s own location identifier, which resolves through the published location lookup to a coded lateral value — nearside, offside or neither. That column covers 100% of the item lines we read, with 0% unmapped. Lines whose coded location names no side — emissions, structure, whole-vehicle items — are counted separately and never split, which is why 30,125,918 lines sit outside the comparison rather than being allocated to one side.

How a defect item is identified. The open dataset names each item by DVSA’s internal rfr_id. It carries no MOT inspection-manual section reference, so the section groupings on this page are our own roll-up of the DVSA item descriptions into named component groups, not the manual’s numbering. Item codes are shown as RfR nnnnn so they can be looked up against the dataset directly.

Left-right ratios are only reported for items with at least 40,000 sided lines and sections with at least 20,000, so no claim about a side rests on a small count, and every ratio quoted on this page is published with its sample size. Every figure comes from scripts/research/03-defect-corpus.mjs.

What this data cannot tell you

  • The fleet-wide left-right difference is not a finding, and we do not present it as one. At 0.47% it is smaller than any effect this page is about. Everything asymmetric here is about a named mechanism on a named component, measured against its own sample size.
  • This is not a pass or failure rate and must not be read as one. These are defect lines: one test can contribute several, and one vehicle can be tested more than once in the year. Most lines are advisories logged on cars that passed.
  • Some asymmetry is designed in, not worn in. The most one-sided item in the entire dataset is a statutory design feature and is excluded from every ratio on this page — see the section on the rear fog lamp below. We looked for that class of artefact before reporting a mechanism, not after.
  • No location, so no regional claim. The open dataset carries no postcode, so we cannot say which parts of the country drive the nearside skew in wheel and tyre damage. The obvious next study — nearside wheel damage against local road-condition statistics — needs a data source we do not have. We say so rather than implying a link we have not measured.
  • Association, not proof of cause. The nearside skew in impact-type defects is consistent with kerb and pothole exposure, and the offside skew in the driver’s seat belt is consistent with use. Those are the most plausible mechanisms; they are not demonstrated by this data alone.
  • One calendar year, not a rolling window. The whole of the calendar year covered by the test-item extract, not a rolling twelve months: every item line of every class-4/7 test in the year. A seasonal effect within the year is invisible at this level of aggregation.

Correction, 28 August 2026 — the original headline claim has been withdrawn

When this page was first published on 14 August 2026 it reported that nearside defects run 3.8% ahead of offside across the fleet. That claim is withdrawn. It was computed from a data load we have since found to be truncated — only 29.62% of the intended records were present — and it took the side of each defect by pattern-matching the words “nearside” and “offside” in tester free text.

Everything on this page has been re-derived from DVSA and DfT’s open Anonymised MOT tests and results dataset, taking the side from DVSA’s own coded location column across all 91,592,223 defect lines of 2025. On that basis the fleet-wide nearside excess is 0.47% and the front and rear quadrant ratios are both within 1.5% of parity. There is no fleet-wide nearside problem.

What survives — at roughly five times the sample, under a completely independent coding scheme — is the mechanism result this article was really about: road wheels 1.97× nearside, the driver’s seat belt 2.33× offside. The article below now leads on that. Every count is also much larger than first published, because the earlier figures were computed on less than a third of the data: 91,592,223 defect lines rather than the 16.3 million originally stated, and 3,543,478 dangerous-marked lines rather than 46,702.

A UK car is not symmetrical in the way it meets the road. The left-hand side — the nearside — is the one that meets kerbs when parking, drain covers, the broken edge of the carriageway and the potholes that form there first. The right-hand side is the one the driver sits on and touches every day.

You might expect that to show up as a general excess of defects on the left. It does not. Across 91,592,223 defect lines recorded on 20,555,638 vehicles in 2025, the nearside carries 30,805,048 and the offside 30,661,257 — a difference of 0.47%. Split by corner it is flatter still: front nearside to front offside is 0.996, rear nearside to rear offside 1.015. On the average, the two sides of a British car are the same.

The interesting result is what happens when you stop averaging.

The wheel and the seat belt

Take the two mechanisms at the extremes, because between them they make the case that the side marker is measuring something real rather than a habit of how testers type.

Nearside (kerb side)Offside (driver's side)
Road wheel badly distorted (RfR 31164) — impact damage
322,209
163,859
Seat belt webbing weakened (RfR 32134) — wear from use
38,006
88,618
Defect lines recorded on class 4 and 7 tests in 2025. Side taken from DVSA's coded location column. Source: MOT Checkup analysis of the DVSA/DfT anonymised MOT tests and results dataset.

A badly distorted road wheel is the closest thing the MOT vocabulary has to a record of a single hard impact — a kerb strike, or a pothole hit at speed. It is logged on the nearside 1.97 times as often as the offside: 322,209 against 163,859, from 486,068 sided lines.

Seat belt webbing damage runs the opposite way by an even larger factor — 88,618 offside against 38,006 nearside, 2.33×, from 126,624 sided lines. There is nothing mysterious about that: it is the driver’s belt, and it is pulled across a body on every journey while the front passenger belt often is not.

That mirror image is the whole point, and it is why the flat average matters rather than embarrasses. If the side marker were noise, both would sit near 1.00 like the fleet total does. If testers simply defaulted to one side, both would lean the same way. Instead the defect caused by the road skews hard to the road edge, the defect caused by the occupant skews hard to the seat that is always occupied, and the two effects cancel almost exactly when you add up every line in the country. The marker is tracking mechanism, and averaging destroys it.

Which mechanisms lean which way

Ranking every DVSA-coded defect item with at least 40,000 sided lines by its nearside-to-offside ratio produces a coherent ordering rather than a scatter. These are the items that lean to the kerb side.

MOT defect items most skewed to the nearside
Defect itemSectionNearsideOffsideNS ÷ OS
Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult beltRfR 10003Non-component advisories505,421219,6192.30
Transmission oil leaks leaking excessively from transmissionRfR 31942Noise, emissions and leaks33,90717,0611.99
Condition badly distortedRfR 31164Road wheels322,209163,8591.97
Condition has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structureRfR 32036Tyres304,214171,2441.78
Condition has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cordsRfR 31186Tyres748,177550,3271.36
reflectors defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surfaceRfR 31091Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment43,68634,1671.28
Side repeaters lens defective which has no effect on emitted lightRfR 31011Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment56,49745,8121.23
Side repeaters not workingRfR 31009Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment86,81273,0081.19

Two of these are road exposure. A badly distorted wheel (1.97×, n = 486,068) and a tyre with a structural bulge (1.78×, n = 475,458) are the same event seen from the metal and the rubber: a sidewall and a rim pinched against the edge of something hard. Two independently coded items, the same story, the same side.

The item at the top of the table is not damage at all, and it is worth being clear about that. “Child Seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt” (RfR 10003) is the tester noting that a fitted child seat stopped them inspecting an adult belt, and it runs 2.30× nearside on 725,040 sided lines. That is a fact about where families put child seats — behind the front passenger, on the kerb side, which is the side a child is lifted out on — rather than about wear. We include it because it is a second, completely separate confirmation that the coded side tracks how a car is actually used, and we label it for what it is rather than letting it pass as road damage.

And these are the items that lean to the driver’s side.

MOT defect items most skewed to the offside
Defect itemSectionNearsideOffsideOS ÷ NS
Condition webbing significantly weakened cut from edge greater than 2mmRfR 32134Seat belts and restraints38,00688,6182.33
Condition webbing significantly weakened cut greater than 4mmRfR 32135Seat belts and restraints54,778123,3312.25
Service brake performance excessively bindingRfR 30478Brakes336,861422,3591.25
Coil spring fractured or brokenRfR 31227Suspension392,658489,2931.25
Service brake performance excessively bindingRfR 32066Brakes96,811120,0371.24
Rigid brake pipes excessively corrodedRfR 30305Brakes1,040,3991,265,8241.22
Parking brake performance inoperative on one sideRfR 30499Brakes81,15596,6551.19
Play in steering rack inner joint(s)RfR 10019Non-component advisories242,705287,2731.18

This list is use and corrosion rather than impact: both seat belt webbing items, brakes binding, a fractured coil spring, corroded rigid brake pipes. Nothing here is caused by the road edge, and nothing here leans to the kerb.

One item we excluded on purpose

The most one-sided item in the entire dataset is not in either table. “fog lamp not working” (RfR 31043) is recorded 83,919 times on the offside against 1,191 on the nearside — a ratio of 70.46 to one, far beyond anything wear produces.

It is excluded because it is not a finding about damage at all. UK lighting regulations require a single rear fog lamp on the offside or centre line, so a nearside rear fog lamp usually does not exist to be faulty. A defect can only be recorded on a component that exists. Leaving it in would have handed us a spectacular number describing nothing but the lighting regulations, and we mention it here rather than deleting it quietly because the same trap is waiting in any left-right analysis of vehicle data.

By component group

Rolling the same lines up to component groups shows the same split at a coarser grain — and shows how completely it disappears into the total.

Nearside (kerb side)Offside (driver's side)
Tyres
9,665k
9,130k
Suspension
8,138k
8,357k
Brakes
4,338k
4,888k
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
3,994k
3,938k
Body, structure and chassis
1,072k
1,078k
Non-component advisories
1,224k
899k
Steering
900k
931k
Visibility / driver's view
806k
811k
Road wheels
405k
232k
Seat belts and restraints
209k
340k
Noise, emissions and leaks
52k
55k
Sided defect lines by component group. Source: MOT Checkup analysis of the DVSA/DfT anonymised MOT tests and results dataset.
Nearside-to-offside ratio by component group
GroupNearsideOffsideNS ÷ OS
Road wheels405,068232,3651.743
Non-component advisories1,223,823898,8111.362
Tyres9,664,7059,130,3831.059
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment3,993,5013,938,4661.014
Body, structure and chassis1,071,8001,078,3370.994
Visibility / driver's view805,861811,0330.994
Suspension8,138,3898,356,8410.974
Steering900,416931,1070.967
Noise, emissions and leaks51,53855,0760.936
Brakes4,338,4434,887,8410.888
Seat belts and restraints209,471339,7170.617

Road wheels is the most nearside-skewed group at 1.743 — 405,068 nearside against 232,365 offside — and seat belts and restraints the most offside-skewed at 0.617, the same mirror image one level up. Tyres lean gently to the kerb (1.059) and brakes to the driver (0.888). Yet the two largest groups are near-symmetric, and they dominate the count, which is why the fleet total lands at 0.47% and tells you nothing.

Every advisory on your car is tagged with a side

Read the defect pattern on the car you're looking at

The full MOT history shows every advisory, which corner of the car it was on, and whether the same item keeps coming back — the pattern that tells you what the car has been through.

  • Every advisory and defect, with its position on the car
  • Repeat items across years highlighted
  • Free, from the official DVSA record
UK

Free. Official DVSA data. No sign-up.

The most-recorded MOT defects in Britain

Separately from the left-right question, the dataset answers a simpler one: what do MOT testers actually write down? These are the twenty most-recorded defect items, with how many of each are advisories rather than failures.

Most frequently recorded MOT defect items
#DefectLinesAdvisoryFail
1Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirementsRfR 3119410,702,92991%957,620
2A tyre seriously damagedRfR 320375,720,87696%247,224
3Brake disc or drum excessively weakened, insecure or fracturedRfR 303355,297,26798%93,758
4a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mmRfR 303294,393,34084%690,100
5A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornRfR 313224,173,83186%573,701
6Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedRfR 303053,036,46890%301,765
7Fluid leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road usersRfR 319402,451,64298%41,904
8A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakenedRfR 312262,282,737100%7,137
9A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakageRfR 321151,940,27483%335,419
10Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously wornRfR 303331,651,76085%244,966
11A suspension component excessively damaged or corrodedRfR 314071,380,46797%46,427
12A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sourcesRfR 310841,354,5010%1,354,501
13A tyre seriously damagedRfR 311861,325,34957%566,817
14Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirementsRfR 311951,311,66196%43,028
15Number plate inscription missing or illegibleRfR 302021,301,26396%40,654
16A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornRfR 313211,282,58857%548,203
17Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's viewRfR 308231,209,2310%1,209,231
18Exhaust system leaking or insecureRfR 315331,138,78579%238,537
19A suspension component excessively damaged or corrodedRfR 313021,074,94495%49,612
20A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioningRfR 32041975,3440%690,315

Tyre tread depth is far and away the most-recorded item in the country at 10,702,929 lines, of which 90.6% are advisories — a tread approaching the limit rather than already below it. Our tyre tread and pressure guide covers what the tester is measuring and how to check it yourself.

Most defects are advisories

Defect lines by severity
SeverityLinesShare
ADVISORY61,088,92966.70%
MAJOR17,086,85818.66%
MINOR7,232,4597.90%
DANGEROUS3,543,4783.87%
PRS2,640,4992.88%

This is the single most misread thing about MOT defect data. An advisory is a warning about something that will need attention before it becomes a failure — it is not itself a reason to fail, and a car can be issued a pass certificate carrying a long list of them. 66.7% of every defect line recorded in 2025 was one. At the other end, 3,543,478 lines were marked dangerous, across 2,531,499 tests — 6.09% of every class 4 and 7 test carried out in the year. Our explainer on advisories versus minor defects sets out what each category actually obliges you to do.

What we would do next, and cannot yet

The obvious follow-up is to test the road-surface explanation directly: take nearside wheel and tyre defect rates by area and compare them against local highway authority road-condition statistics. We cannot do it. The open dataset carries no postcode, so there is no geography to join on. Rather than gesture at a correlation we have not measured, we are stating the limit. If you hold or can point us to MOT records with an area marker, we would like to run it — hello@motcheckup.co.uk.

Repeat nearside advisories are a pattern worth spotting

Check a car's full advisory history before you buy it

Enter the registration for every defect and advisory DVSA holds, including which corner of the car each one was on and whether it has come back year after year.

  • Every advisory, with its position on the car
  • Repeat items flagged across the whole history
  • Mileage record and outstanding recalls alongside
UK

Free. Official DVSA data. No sign-up.

Cite this research

harvard

Use this citation when referencing this report in articles, papers, or blog posts. Refreshes the access date each time the page loads.

MOT Checkup (2026) 'Nearside or Offside? What 91.6 Million MOT Defects Show'. Available at: https://www.motcheckup.co.uk/research/uk-mot-defect-laterality-2026 (Accessed: 3 October 2026).

Download the data

The full Nearside or Offside? What 91.6 Million MOT Defects Show dataset is available free. MOT Checkup's compilation and analysis are released under CC BY 4.0 — reuse with attribution to MOT Checkup. That grant covers our aggregation and presentation, not the underlying source records.

Download CSVDownload PDFSoon

Using this research

Journalists, researchers and site owners are welcome to reproduce any table or chart on this page with attribution to MOT Checkup. Our analysis, tables and charts are released under CC BY 4.0. They are computed by MOT Checkup from the DVSA/DfT “Anonymised MOT tests and results” dataset published on data.gov.uk, which contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. The CC BY grant covers our aggregation and presentation; the underlying records remain under the OGL. If you need a cut of the data we have not published — a specific model, a different age band, a regional split — email hello@motcheckup.co.uk and we will run it.

Frequently asked questions

What do nearside and offside mean on an MOT certificate?

In the UK the nearside is the left-hand side of the car — the side nearest the kerb — and the offside is the right-hand, driver's side nearest the middle of the road. When an MOT tester records a defect, DVSA stores the position it was found in as a coded field, which is why an advisory reads like "Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit".

Are MOT defects more common on the nearside or the offside?

Overall, no — the two sides are level. Across 91,592,223 defect lines there are 30,805,048 nearside against 30,661,257 offside, a difference of just 0.47%, and front and rear quadrants are within 1.5% of parity. The imbalance is in specific mechanisms, not in the fleet average: distorted road wheels are recorded 1.97 times as often on the nearside (n = 486,068 sided lines), while driver's-side seat belt webbing damage runs 2.33 times the passenger side (n = 126,624).

Why are nearside wheels more likely to be buckled?

The nearside is the kerb side. It takes the drain covers, the broken edges, the kerbs during parking and the potholes that form fastest at the road edge where the surface is weakest and water collects. Road wheels are the most nearside-skewed section in the whole dataset at 1.743 to one, and a distorted wheel is the clearest single-impact defect in the MOT vocabulary.

Why is the offside seat belt more likely to be damaged?

Because it is the driver's belt, and it is used on every single journey while the front passenger belt is not. That result is not an interesting road-safety finding in itself — it is a control. Seat belts and restraints is the most offside-skewed section (0.617 nearside to offside) while road wheels is the most nearside-skewed, which is what makes the wheel result credible rather than an artefact of how testers record things.

Does DVSA publish nearside and offside defect statistics?

Not as published statistics. DVSA's own MOT statistical tables report defects by category and vehicle class and do not break them down by side. The side itself is not hidden, though: DfT's open "Anonymised MOT tests and results" dataset carries a coded location for every defect item, and that is what this analysis reads. What is unusual here is the aggregation, not access to the field.

Are most MOT defects actually failures?

No, and this matters when reading any defect statistic. Of the 91,592,223 defect lines here, 66.7% are advisories — items the tester flagged for future attention rather than reasons to fail. 3,543,478 lines carry DVSA's dangerous marker, 3.87% of the total.

What should I do with this if I'm buying a used car?

Read the sides on the MOT history. Repeated nearside wheel, tyre or suspension advisories on one car suggest it has lived somewhere with poor road surfaces or has been kerbed regularly, and the underlying suspension geometry is worth having checked. Repeated corrosion advisories on either side matter far more for whether the car has a future.

Sources and further reading

  1. 1.DVSA/DfT — Anonymised MOT tests and results (the open bulk dataset this analysis is computed from) — Primary data (Open Government Licence)
  2. 2.Open Government Licence v3.0 — Licence
  3. 3.DVSA MOT inspection manual — car and passenger vehicle testing (what each defect item means) — Reference
  4. 4.DVSA — MOT testing data for Great Britain — Official statistics
  5. 5.Department for Transport — road conditions statistics (RDC tables) — Official statistics
  6. 6.MOT Checkup — free MOT history check by registration — Tool
  7. 7.MOT Checkup — common MOT faults by make and model — Tool
  8. 8.MOT Checkup — how long UK cars actually last — Related research

About this research

MOT Checkup publishes original analysis of UK vehicle data. Every figure on this page was produced by a script committed to our repository and run against the source records described above — we do not publish estimates, modelled figures or numbers we cannot reproduce. Where an analysis did not hold up, we dropped it rather than soften it. Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct the page and note the correction.

More checks before you buy

Run all of these on any UK car before you pay a deposit — every one is free to start.

Full Car Check

MOT, mileage, tax and spec by reg — the free starting point.

MOT History Check

Every test, advisory and failure on the DVSA record — free.

DVLA Vehicle Check

The DVLA registration record and DVSA MOT history in one search.

Car Import Check

No free import marker exists — how to read the four indicators instead.

Mileage / Clocking Check

Spots odometer rollbacks and implausible jumps across MOTs.

MOT Failure History

Pass-rate and recurring-failure patterns from MOT history.

Outstanding Finance

Why unpaid finance can cost you the car — and how to verify.

Stolen Car Check

The warning signs of a stolen vehicle before you pay a deposit.

Write-Off Check

Cat A/B/S/N explained and what a write-off means for buyers.

Cat S / Cat N Check

Insurance write-off categories explained — is it worth buying?

HPI Check Alternative

What each check covers and costs — an honest price comparison.

Car Tax Check

Tax status, due date and SORN by registration — free.

Insurance Group Check

The 1–50 insurance group for any model — what it will cost to cover.

Is My Car Insured?

How to confirm a car's insurance status before you drive it away.

Car Tax Calculator

Estimate the annual VED road tax for any car by reg or spec.

Car Recall Check

Check DVSA safety recalls for the make and model, free.

Selling Your Car

See the record a buyer will pull on your reg — before they pull it.

Service History: Who Holds It

No site can look one up. Who really has the record, by make.

Used Car Buying Checklist

The full step-by-step checklist before you buy a used car.

Buying a Cat S / Cat N Car

Is a write-off worth it? The honest costs, risks and decision rule.

Check Finance Before Buying

Why there's no free finance check — and how to verify before you pay.

What Does HPI Clear Mean?

Why an 'HPI clear' result does NOT mean accident-free.

How to Spot a Clocked Car

The tell-tale signs of mileage fraud before you buy.

What Is a Cat S Car?

Category S write-off meaning — structural damage, explained.

What Is a Cat N Car?

Category N write-off meaning — and why 'non-structural' isn't 'minor'.